>
>
2026-01-30
In industrial automation, your control and measurement systems are only as reliable as their weakest link. For critical signals like the 4-20mA loop, Electromagnetic Interference (EMI) and Radio-Frequency Interference (RFI) are invisible threats that can introduce errors, cause process drift, and lead to costly downtime or safety incidents. The decision between shielded and unshielded instrumentation cables is the foundational choice for system integrity.
This guide provides a clear, data-driven comparison to help you make the optimal specification for signal accuracy and long-term reliability.
![]()
The primary question is not about cost, but about the electrical environment and the criticality of the signal.
Shielded vs. Unshielded Cables: Decision Factors
| Factor | Shielded Instrumentation Cable | Unshielded Instrumentation Cable | Technical Rationale & Implication |
|---|---|---|---|
| Core Purpose | Signal Protection. Actively deflects and grounds EMI/RFI to preserve data integrity. | Basic Signal Transmission. Designed for electrically quiet environments with negligible noise. | In noisy settings, shielding is not optional; it's essential for data fidelity. |
| Noise Rejection | High. Can achieve 80 dB to 100+ dB of noise attenuation, depending on shield type. | Very Low. Relies on cable twisting for minimal common-mode rejection (typically <30 dB). | Unshielded cables cannot guarantee signal accuracy where EMI is present. |
| Typical Cost Premium | ~25% to 50% higher than equivalent unshielded versions due to material and complexity. | Lower initial material and installation cost. | The premium is an investment in system reliability and accuracy, preventing far greater operational costs. |
| Ideal Application | High-noise areas: Power plants, motor/VFD rooms, near radio transmitters, process control loops for flow/pressure/temperature. | Electrically quiet areas: Office LANs, control rooms with dedicated trays, short-run DC power, or non-critical digital signals. | Misapplication is a direct risk to process stability and product quality. |
Once shielding is deemed necessary, selecting the right type is crucial. Different shield constructions offer varying levels of protection across frequency ranges.
Shield Type Specifications & Performance Data
| Shield Type | Construction & Coverage | Typical Shielding Effectiveness (SE) | Key Strengths & Best-For Scenarios |
|---|---|---|---|
| Foil Shield (ASTP) | A thin, laminated aluminum/polyester tape wrapped longitudally. Offers ~100% coverage at a microscopic level. | Excellent at High Frequencies (>1 MHz). 60-90 dB attenuation for RFI. | Cost-effective, lightweight, small bend radius. Ideal for fixed installations with high-frequency noise (telecom, radio). |
| Braided Shield (BSTP) | A mesh of tinned copper wires woven (braided) around the core. Coverage typically 70%-95%. | Good at Low to Mid Frequencies (<10 MHz). 40-70 dB attenuation. Provides superior mechanical strength. | Durable, flexible, easier to terminate. Best for dynamic applications with general plant EMI and physical strain. |
| Composite Shield (SF/UTP) | Combination of foil + separate braid. The foil provides 100% coverage; the braid adds low-frequency protection and durability. | Superior Broad-Spectrum Protection. Can achieve >100 dB attenuation across a wide frequency range. | Maximum protection for critical applications. Used in extreme noise environments (refineries, large drive systems, sensitive analog signals). |
![]()
Use this flow chart and risk analysis to guide your specification process.
Step 1: Assess Your Environment. Ask:
Is the cable path within 3 meters (10 feet) of motors, VFDs, power lines, or radio transmitters?
Is the signal analog (e.g., 4-20mA, thermocouple) or low-voltage digital?
Is signal accuracy critical to safety, quality, or regulatory compliance?
If you answered YES to any, shielding is mandatory.
Step 2: Analyze the Cost of Compromise. Consider the risks for a temperature control loop:
Risk Analysis of Using Unshielded Cable in a Noisy Area
| System Impact | With Unshielded Cable | With Properly Shielded & Grounded Cable | Business Consequence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Signal Stability | EMI induces a ±0.3 mA to 1.0 mA noise onto a 4-20mA signal. | Signal noise maintained within ±0.02 mA. | Noise can cause process variable fluctuations exceeding ±10%, leading to off-spec production. |
| Control System Action | Erratic readings cause the PLC/DCS to constantly over-correct. | Stable readings allow for precise, optimal PID control. | Increased wear on valves/heaters, higher energy consumption, reduced equipment life. |
| Maintenance Overhead | Engineers spend hours troubleshooting "ghost" process issues. | System operates predictably with minimal diagnostic effort. | High labor costs for debugging and significant risk of unplanned downtime. |
The Verdict: For industrial environments, the Total Cost of Ownership (TCO) of a shielded cable—factoring in reliability, quality, and safety—is almost always lower than the risks associated with an unshielded solution.
Other Related Articles:
Your Expert Partner in Critical Connectivity
[Contact our engineering team for a custom consultation or request a sample].
Contact Us at Any Time